Tuesday, 1 October 2013

തളിക്കുളം ഭൂമി ഇടപാട് വെറും തട്ടിപ്പ്.

The custodian of CSI NKD property is the TREASURER of the Diocese and he is responsible for the purchase and sale of the property. Here in Talikulam, the property deal is NULL and VOID as the executor in the document is Bishop (former retired Bishop Dr. K.P. Kuruvila) who has no authority to purchase or sale any property. we understood that the treasurer of that time – Rev. B.N. Fenn very cleverly misguided and mislead the Bishop Dr. K. P. Kuruvila to sign and execute the sale deed thus to save his image and put blame on Bishop Dr. K.P. Kuruvila and Rev. B.N. Fenn was successful on that as he washed off his hands from the deal and put the blame completely on Dr. K. P. Kuruvila.
We are producing the sale deed agreement last page to let you know the details. Pls. find the 1st. witness! normally any person who signs a document will put their name first with initial and then son of / daughter of. Look at the name of the first witness at first sight; one will not know who it is. It is well-planned and the lady who signed the witness is the wife of CSI NKD clergy secretary and chief accountant of the Diocese then.
Things would have been different if Dr. K.P. Kuruvila had allowed them to utilize the money for their purpose.


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

chwhy did the reporter dip/hide this truth till this time? You could have revealed it little earlier when the issue was burning. P K Kuruvilla Thirumany had not been misled neither forced. No one would commit mistake in property deal by ignorance. Such things happen only when the people maliciously approach for it. So such deliberate actions shall not be excused or diluted by inclination. If P K Kuruvilla Thirumany was upright and serene he must have used the ample opportunity to convince his innocence in the public. But he never opened up. That means he was part of it or he is the one who forced others to do so. Signatories of the deal are not clear and known. Can you make clear their role in the deal? And why they are not punished?
Thomas Trissur

Anonymous said...

I think Bishop KPK had gone in to a stage where he was not believing any body around him. as whoever he believed had betrayed him.(on first by not allowing public to hear him and secondly by keeping him away from public by the wrong versions).. the list is long. so he was keeping quiet on all matters in his last year as bishop